NYC’s Newest Craft Brewery: Singlecut Beersmiths

TBP Podcast Episode 004: Extended Cut of my interview with Singlecut Beersmiths’ founder and brewmaster Rich Buceta:

On Thursday, December 20th I headed to Astoria, Queens to check out New York City’s newest craft brewery Singlecut Beersmiths . While hanging out with the brewery’s founder Rich Buceta my goal was to obtain as much information as possible about his beers, what lead up to the brewery’s opening on December 8th, and his plans for the upcoming months. Between the above video and podcast episode I believe that I achieved that goal and am happy to share what I learned with you. In turn, I’d like to join the NYC craft beer community in welcoming Singlecut Beersmiths into our community and to the American craft beer industry (scene).

The following topics are discussed in this podcast episode:

  • Rich’s “craft beer story” and brewing history
  • Construction of the brewery and preparation for opening on Dec. 8, 2012
  • Choosing which beers to first release upon opening Singlecut Beersmiths
  • Singlecut barrel program – Jamaican rum barrels
  • Finding a site for the brewery – reasons why Rich chose Astoria, Queens
  • Tasting Room – combining the brewery staff’s love for beer and music
  • Brewhouse specs – inspiration behind starting with a 30bbl brewhouse
  • Flagship Beer – 19-33 Lagrrr (Czech/German Pilsner)
  • Reasons behind Rich’s choice to specialize in lagers
  • Dean Pacific Northwest Mahogany Ale – Red IPA
  • Singlecut Beersmith’s self distribution – “Embracing the whole craft beer industry”
  •  New Beer! – Olympic White Lager, brewed w/ spices and matzoh meal – Kegged Dec 20th (while I was at the brewery)
  • Beers in the works
  • Plans for the upcoming months
  • Welcoming Rich and Singlesmiths in the NYC craft beer community  and American craft beer scene

In an upcoming post: Reviews of 19-33 Lagrrr, Dean Pacific Northwest Mahogany Ale, and Olympic White Lager.

Cheers!

 
Posted in Beer Reviews, Brewery Tour, Brewmaster Interviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Stone Enjoy by 12.21.12

20121208_222000

While I planned on posting this review closer to when I actually drank this purposely and extremely fresh double IPA i.e. 12/8/12. I was inspired by Stone Brewing Co. CEO Greg Koch’s “GK vBlog Enjoy(ing) By 12.21.12 IPA Amongst the Ruins of the Maya” video to wait post this review until the date on the bottle. Next, having been lucky to try the first batch of Enjoy By IPA which was dated 9.21.12; it was a given that I would seek out a few bottles of this “apocalyptic” IPA to split (enjoy) with my hophead friends.

Before getting into my thoughts on this beer I must reiterate that its significance to the Mayan predicted apocalypse should not take precedent over the original purpose of this IPA, which was (is) to highlight the importance of craft beer drinkers drinking and stores selling IPAs fresh i.e. before the aroma and flavoring hops begin to fade. (see TBP Podcast Episode 002 for more on this topic).

In true west coast IPA style Enjoy By 12.12.12 IPA poured a straw to light gold color with one finger of off white head, which quickly dissipated to a layer over the top of the beer and left some nice lacing on my Stone taster glass. With just the right amount of visible carbonation the beers aromas filled the room as a I took a minute to admire its appearance. Those aromas consisted of ripe grapfruit, mango, and pineapple, a touch of dank earthisness, and some sweet bready malt. With the high alcohol taking a back seat here to the  bright fruit hop character, it did add to the malt backbone with an inviting sweetness and spiciness.

The taste took the inviting aroma took me to an even higher state of hophead heaven with big west coast citrusy hop character and some dank (somewhat earthy) hop astringency upfront. At mid palate the hops blossomed a bit more and I was able to distinctly taste the ripe grapefruit that I picked up on the aroma along with some peach and orange zest. Finishing this experience of each sip were lingering grapefruit, earthy, and some piney hop notes and a moderately sweet and dry bready malt. While not so noticeable at first some malt and alcohol sweetness did creep in as the beer warmed up and the bitterness built on the back of my palate. Interestingly enough, at times (while drinking) described the flavor profile of this beer as being similar to double dry hopped ruination and 10th Anniversary Ruination IPA, but with less lingering bitterness. Lastly, when I checked into this beer on Untappd I remarked that I’m “not sure the Mayans would have picked this date if they had tried this beer.”

Overall, I really enjoyed this Enjoy By series from Stone and I hope they continue to showcase the potential of hops and publicize the importance of their being enjoyed fresh. Rating: 8.5/10

Questions of this post: 1) If you tried this beer or any of the other Enjoy By IPAs, what were your overall impressions? 2) What is your picture of IPA freshness nowadays? e.g. Is it at times challenging to find fresh IPAs or other hop forward beers on store shelves or on tap at your local beer bars?

Posted in Beer Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

TBP Podcast Ep. 003: Greg Avola, co-founder & CTO of Untappd

On 12/13/12 I met up with Untappd‘s co-founder and CTO, Greg Avola to get the inside scoop on the success his social beer app has accrued since its humble beginnings in 2010. In this episode of The Brewed Palate podcast I chose to ask Greg a combination of questions I prepared and questions from craft beer fans on Google Plus and Reddit. In addition, before asking my last couple of questions Greg and I give our thoughts in He’brew’s Hop Manna IPA i.e. the beer that we were drinking while we chatted at a table at NYC’s Beer Authority craft beer bar. Enjoy and Cheers!

The following topics are discussed in this episode:

  • History and description of Untappd
  • Growth of Untappd – added features
  • Greg’s craft beer story and inspiration behind the Untappd app
  • Role of beer apps in the craft beer community nowadays
  • Record amount of Westvleteren 12 and Stone Vertical Epic check-ins on 12/12/12
  • Creation of and inspiration behind Untappd badges
  • Craft beer trends as seen through Untappd
  • The future of Untappd – improvements in the works etc.
  • What it takes to run the app as it gets more popular
  • Viewer question (Google plus): Google plus add-on
  • Viewer question (Google plus): Adding features to rate beers with greater accuracy and detail
  • Viewer question (Reddit): At what point does untappd become profitable enough that he and his business partner can quit their day jobs and just do Untappd?
  • Viewer question (Reddit): What is going to separate the free app users from the supporters?
  • Quick review: He’Brew (Shmaltz) Hop Manna IPA
  • Which beer styles Greg gravitates towards now that he’s been drinking craft beer for a few years
  • Drinking local beer from Untappd’s perspective, “Local Flavor” badge
Posted in Brewmaster Interviews, Craft Beer Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Stone Vertical Epic 12/12/12 Tasting @ Blind Tiger Ale House

Vertical Epic.001

One Wednesday 12/12/12 aka Stone Vertical Epic day I went to Blind Tiger Ale House (281 Bleecker St., NYC) to try the vintages that they were able to procure for that epic day. Out the 11 vertical epic vintages they had 4 in bottles (05-08) and 4 on tap (09-12). In the end I tried 7 of them, each of them served in 5 to 6oz sample glasses. Luckily, my girlfriend gave me a tasting notes journal as a Hanukkah gift and I was able to easily write down tasting notes while slowly drinking each vintage.

Note: I tasted each vintage one by one, and then after writing down initial tasting notes I let them warm up and wrote additional notes as necessary. Next, in order to ease your reading of these notes I have structured them as follows…Appearance, aroma, taste, mouthfeel/drinkability, and an overall impression and rating.

20121212_122655Vertical Epic Ale 05.05.05 – Belgian Strong Dark Ale – 8.5% abv – bottle

Appearance: Dark amber with great clarity and a nice 1 finger khaki head which dissipated to a layer over the top of the beer (surprising for a 7 yo. beer). Aroma: Sweet and malt forward with big notes of caramel, toffee, cherries, dates, and some semi-sweet chocolate. Taste: Initially quite similar to the aroma with sweet caramel and toffee upfront and subtle dark fruits. Though as it warmed the malt character was followed by bright cherry notes. Mouthfeel / Drinkability: Medium to full bodied with big sweetness upfront that was soon followed by a nice dryness at mid-palate which prevented the lingering malt flavors from becoming too sweet. Overall: For its age this beer still boasted a ‘big beer’ flavor profile. Though it was fermented with a belgian yeast strain, the malt character at times reminded me of a scotch ale or old ale. Rating: 7/10

20121212_124201Vertical Epic Ale 06.06.06 – Abbey Dubbel – 8.6% abv – bottle

Appearance: Ruby red in color with some cloudiness and no head to speak of (result of age?). Aroma: Quite complex with notes of caramel, chocolate, spicy clove, anise, and a hint of lemon. Taste:  Just as complex as the aroma with dark fruits such as dates and cherries added. The anise blended into an overall spicy character/flavor as the beer warmed and kept me interested. There was also a slight earthiness in the finish. Mouthfeel / Drinkability: Medium bodied with a nice dry finish. I sensed a slight alcohol burn as I swallowed. A nice sipper! Overall: With the amount of complexity remaining in this vintage I was excited for each sip and glad to taste the flavors changing as the beer warmed. I’d call this one a dubbel with the complexity of a quadrupel. Rating: 8/10

20121212_125410 Vertical Epic Ale 07.07.07 – Spiced Belgian Strong Pale Ale – 8.4% abv – bottle

Appearance: Orange to gold with no head and a moderate amount of carbonation rising from the bottom of the glass. Aroma: Bubblegum, lemon, black pepper, and fresh herbs (akin to a Saison/Farmhouse Ale). Taste: I should note that it wasn’t until after my first few sips that I found out that various spices were added to this beer during brewing. Upfront I picked up the bubblegum and lemon which at times reminded me of a Tripel. Then the spices came in with notes of anise (probably the cardamom used) and pink peppercorns. Mouthfeel / Drinkability: This beer was medium bodied with a dry finish and moderate drinkability. Overall: As the beer warmed up the cardamom and ginger added to this beer became quite prominent and detracted from my enjoyment of this beer. However, while the resulting flavor profile was not my cup of tea, I could see others enjoying it and being impressed by how well the spices stood up to aging. Rating: 6.5/10

20121212_132513_2Vertical Epic Ale 08.08.08 – Belgian Strong Pale Ale w/ American hops – 8.4% abv – bottle

Appearance: (cropped picture) Straw to light golden color with a no head and some visible carbonation. Aroma: Big citrus fruits i.e. lemon peal, grapefruit, and pineapple along with some sweet bready malt and a hint of spice. Taste: Citrus fruits upfront with the malts rushing in at mid palate only to have the fruits and spice return in the finish and take on an almost perfumey quality. Mouthfeel / Drinkability: Smooth medium body with a somewhat spicy finish and great drinkability which was aided by the carbonation pushing the big citrusy flavors over my palate. Overall: Out of the first 4 vintages that I tried this was the most impressive. With so much citrus fruit character left (even as the beer warmed) after four years of aging I was left wishing I had a bottle to take home. Rating: 8.5/10

20121212_153033_2Vertical Epic Ale 09.09.09 – Belgian Stout – 8.65% abv – on tap

Appearance: (cropped picture) Stout black with ruby red highlights when held up to the light. A thin layer of tan head and noticeable carbonation when tilted the glass. Aroma: Cocoa, dark chocolate, and a hint of vanilla. Very much like many aged imperial stouts that I’ve tried. Taste: Really nice aged Russian Imperial Stout taste with notes of milk chocolate and cocoa being followed by some dark fruit and roasted malt at mid palate, and a hint of the added tangerine peal in the finish. Mouthfeel / Drinkability: Quite smooth with a higher end of medium body. I picked up a slight roasted malt astringency in the finish of some sips, but it didn’t significantly affect drinkability. Overall: For a three year old ‘Belgian Stout’ this beer aged pretty well and didn’t have as much oxidative flavors as other aged stouts that I’ve tried. Rating 8/10

fe58bef21e0e7a014f281d74d3f8747d_320x320Vertical Epic Ale 11.11.11 – Belgian Strong Pale Ale w/ cinnamon and chiles added – 9.4% abv – on tap

Appearance: A cloudy dark gold (close to copper) with a thin layer of tan head that left some nice lacing on my glass. Aroma: Sweet bready and biscuity malts joined by notes of caramel, lemon, and sweet yet strong cinnamon. Taste: Caramel, cinnamon, and a slight earthiness that was followed by a tasty graham cracker-like finish. Initially I didn’t taste the added chiles, but once the beer warmed up the earthy notes intensified and I picked up some distinct chile flavor and a touch of spice. Mouthfeel / Drinkability: Medium bodied with a balanced sweetness and pleasing flavor profile. The beer’s chile flavors did not affect drinkability for me. Overall: Interestingly enough I bought two bottles of this vintage back in 2011, but didn’t open either of them at the time. So now that I enjoyed this beer with a year of age on it I am curious to see how my bottles have aged. Rating: 8/10

20121212_142844Vertical Epic Ale 12.12.12 – Spiced BSDA or Dubbel – 9% abv – on tap

Appearance: Opaque brown with a 1 finger dark khaki to light brown head that left lots of lacing behind on my glass. Aroma: Pungent winter spices with toffee, sweet biscuity malt, and caramel. Taste: Similar to the aroma with nutmeg and allspice combining with the sweet malts and being followed by hints of ginger and roasted malt. Mouthfeel / Drinkability: Full bodied with big sweetness at mid palate which is dried out by the spices, hops, and alcohol in the finish. Drinks like a winter ale e.g Anchor Christmas Ale and its abv is hidden quite well. Overall: When it comes to spiced ales I tend to have to be in a winter or spiced ale mood. However, when a strong Belgian ale is over-spiced I become a bit apprehensive in deciding whether the brewer was successful in allowing the beer to retain some of its Belgian (yeast) identity. In this case the spices dominated in a way that any potential Belgian ale yeast character and dark fruit flavor were almost fully masked. Rating: 6.5/10

QOTP (Question of the Post): What were your overall impressions of the Vertical Epic series?

Thanks to Blind Tiger Ale House and Stone Brewing Co. for a great event! 

 

Posted in Beer Reviews | Leave a comment

TBP Podcast 002: Dennis Flynn,Tristate Rep. for Stone Brewing Co.

Screen shot 2012-12-12 at 8.27.36 PM

img_60853On 12/12/12 I headed downtown to Blind Tiger Ale House for their Stone Vertical Epic series culmination event featuring eight of the series’ eleven vintages. While there I sat down with Dennis Flynn, the tristate area (NY,NJ,CT) Stone representative to capture a glimpse into what it’s like to work for Stone Brewing Company. As one of the most popular craft breweries he’s definitely kept quite busy; however the following quotes say it all about his pride for craft beer and Stone Brewing Company. “When I introduce myself to people I say that I’m first and foremost a craft beer enthusiast, then I just happen to work for Stone which is awesome” and “You know, a lot of people say I’m a lucky bastard  and I would have to agree.”

The following topics are covered in this episode:

  • Denis’s history with Stone Brewing Company
  • Growth of Stone’s number of employees
  • Denis’s responsibilities as a sales representative
  • Blind Tiger’s relationship with Stone Brewing Co.
  • Description of the Blind Tiger Vertical Epic event
  • What it takes to allocate special release beers for Stone events
  • How Denis’s craft beer palate and passion have grown over the years
  • Stone’s place in the NYC beer market – successes and challenges
  • Not forgetting to revisit a brewery such as Stone’s core / year round line up while continuing your search for new and interesting craft beers
  • Stone’s emphasis on the freshness of their hop forward beers – Enjoy By IPA and enjoy by dates on bottles
  • What it takes to make sure that stores are selling the freshest hop forward beers
  • The culture of Stone Brewing Co. – relationship between the brewery and its sales representatives
  • The evolution of the Stone gargoyle – what it has come to represent over the years
  • Looking towards the future of Stone Brewing Co. / each representative’s contribution to the growth of the brewery and craft beer as a whole.
  • Stone’s culture outside its larger tristate markets

Note: My tasting notes of the Vertical Epic vintages that I tried will be posted in a separate blog post coming as soon as I finish typing them up.

Cheers!

Posted in Brewmaster Interviews, Craft Beer Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Brew Palate Update 12/11/12

TBP happenings 1210.001

After leaving the craft beer blogging scene for a year and a half to concentrate on my graduate studies; I chose to return with a new blog that would fit my current schedule and view on today’s craft beer scene. Hence, The Brewed Palate, a craft beer blog where I put my own spin on covering various topics related to craft beer. In turn, I hope to spark the curiosity of craft drinkers of all experience levels and motivate them to seek out ways in which they can learn more about what makes craft beer special.

Despite posting on my “own schedule” i.e. not as regularly as most blogs; I have recently realized that I need to post somewhat regularly in order to maintain a consistent amount of blog views. In other words…In order to really spread my perspective of the craft beer scene I need to post often enough to keep craft beer drinkers interested in my views. This realization was sparked by my three most recent blog posts; my Founders Bolt Cutter review, interview of Founders Brewing Company’s Mike Stevens, and Cigar City Brewing Co. trio of reviews. All of which have gotten more views than previous posts and inspired me to continue coming up with ideas for future posts.

I should note that after receiving positive feedback on my interview of Mike Stevens I have decided to name my interviews and audio event coverage “The Brewed Palate Podcast”. So far I have three episodes in the works. The first will be my coverage of Blind Tiger Ale House‘s Stone Vertical Epic 12.12.12 event, the second will be an interview of Untappd‘s co-founder and CTO Greg Avola, and the third episode in the works is an interview and beer tasting with Stillwater Artisanal Ales founder and brewmaster Brian Strumke.

Beyond the text beers reviews that you’ve seen so far on The Brewed Palate, I hope to include reviews within podcast episodes and possibly film and then post an occasional video beer review. Some upcoming reviews are Stone Brewing Co.’s Enjoy By 12.21.12 IPA, Black Boss Porter (a Polish baltic porter), and Blue Mountain Dark Hollow Imperial Stout.

Upon looking at the picture above you may have asked yourself the following question. Why are Firestone Walker Parabola and Drie Fonteinen Oude Geuze Golden Blend included in the line up of bottles? Well…during the week and especially over the weekend I crack open some special beers that I’ve either purchased recently or been aging in my cellar. Last Monday I celebrated with a friend of mine who got into two dental schools by opening the Oude Gueuze Golden Blend (2011). I found it to be quite complex and balanced for a gueuze with a great blend of funk, lemon and green apple tartness, and spicy earthiness. If I get the chance to pick up another bottle I’ll probably age it to allow the funkiness and tartness to develop and intensify. Next, this past Friday night I opened a 2011 bottle of Firestone Walker Parabola to see how it’s aging (I still have another bottle in my cellar). When I first tried this vintage soon after its release I found the body a bit too viscous for me. Though that was most likely due to be splitting the bottle with my brother and 11oz of it may have been too much for my palate to handle at the time. The aged bottle was split between my two brothers and I. After taking a few sips I found the body to have become a bit less viscous and that the flavors had mellowed quite nicely. There was still a great blend of dark chocolate, caramel, vanilla, oak, and toffee, but the characteristic coconut flavor present in fresh bourbon barrel aged stouts (including Parabola) had faded into the overall complex flavor profile and was not distinctly recognizable. I therefore will probably not age my remaining bottle for too much longer so that I can ensure that the flavors I love in this beer will retain their strength and wow factor.

If you have any suggestions for future reviews, podcast episodes, and or videos please comment on this post. I’m looking forward to sharing many more of my craft beer experiences with you in the near future. Cheers!

Posted in Craft Beer Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hops, Malts, Gourds…Cigar City Brewing Does It All

Under the leadership of founder Joey Redner and brewmaster Wayne Wambles, Cigar City Brewing Company (Tampa, Florida) has become known for brewing some of the most creative and innovative beers available to craft beer drinkers nowadays. In turn, when thinking about which craft breweries’ beers relate most to my goals for The Brewed Palate; Cigar City was one of the first that came to mind. Therefore, after contacting the brewery to let them know about my blog, I was glad that they sent me a variety of beers that to me showcase the passion and creativity behind their tasty boundary pushing beers.

20121110_225819Cigar City 110k+OT Batch 5

As the hoppiest beer of the trio of beers that I received for review I chose to open this one first to enjoy the hops as fresh as possible. In addition, I was also curious to taste and smell the affect of the added curacao peel. 110k+OT poured copper to dark gold in color with a one finger off white head that left great lacing on my snifter glass as I slowly savored this double IPA’s complex hop character. As expected the beer had a cloudy body due to yeast leftover from bottle conditioning.

Moving onto the aroma I immediately knew that this bottle was a fresh one. I was met with big notes of peach, lemon, tropical fruit, and a sweet bready malt backbone. Despite its apparent sweetness the malt backbone blended with and at times enhanced the juicy hop aroma which became more complex over time with some added notes of tropical fruit and floral hops. The beer’s flavor profile was similar to its aroma with each sip including a big citrusy and tropical hop character which included notes of  sweet grapefruit, peach, and orange. The malt backbone and finish were a bit boozy at first, but were not too hard to get used to as I casually drank this great Cigar City double IPA while watching tv. Overall the malt flavors enhanced the hops, but I should note that along with the beer’s moderate bitterness I detected some sweet caramel malt in the finish (especially as I took my last few sips)

When reviewing “big beers” it is especially important to comment on the beer’s mouthfeel and drinkability. This is because the higher alcohol content can at times lead to a quite viscous mouthfeel and less pleasing drinkability. With respect to 110k+OT Batch 5’s 11% abv, drinkability was surprisingly high and only minutely affected (a touch of heat in the finish) and wasn’t nearly as boozy as I thought it would be after reading some reviews. Though if you’re new to IPAs of this magnitude (abv) or more sensitive to booziness in beers etc. then I’d recommend drinking this beer on the colder side (45-50F). Its mouthfeel was medium and smooth, and the hop bitterness did not linger which increased my ability to enjoy the complex hop flavors washing over my palate with each subsequent sip.

Overall, I was quite impressed by this beer and am therefore looking forward to what batch #6 has to offer… Rating: 8/10

20121121_214023Good Gourd

After being reminded of the high level of brewing talent of the 110k+OT I chose to wait to open the next beer in this trio i.e. Good Gourd for the following reason. When I first tried pumpkin ales a few years ago I really liked them, but over the past couple years I’ve slowly become less and less enthusiastic about drinking them during the Fall months (when they’re traditionally imbibed). Therefore, in order to appreciate Cigar City Brewing’s take on an imperial pumpkin ale I waited until the night before Thanksgiving to crack open and share the 750ml bottle with my brothers.

As is common with many pumpkin ales, this beer poured reddish orange in color with minimal head, and moderate carbonation with big bubbles around the top of the beer. At 8.5% abv it left dots of lacing on my New Belgium Brewing Co. glass, and as expected nice alcohol legs cascaded down the glass as I swirled the beer to release its aromas. Its cloudy body at times made it difficult to see how much carbonation was present in the beer, but small bubbles were visible when I tilted the glass while holding it up to the light to admire the beer’s appearance.

Upon my first whiff the first words that came to mind were “pumpkie pie!”. I could smell the graham cracker crust, sweet pumpkin, cinnamon, a touch of nutmeg,  and a hint toffee. All of which made for a spicy yet balanced aroma. The taste was similar to aroma, though the spices came more to the forefront. Especially the all spice which peaked in the finish along with the cinnamon and blended with the pumpkin sweetness upfront. In my tasting notes (typed while drinking this beer) I remarked that Good Gourd had a balanced aftertaste that reminded me of spicy pumpkin pie filling. Next, some sips were spicier than others and at one point concerned me to the point of being reminiscent of a pumpkin scented candle. In other words, the spices added an a slightly astringent earthiness that detracted from my enjoyment of the pumpkin and malt sweetness. In addition, at times the pumpkin tasted like pie filling or puree i.e. it did not taste as fresh as the spices did. Though I must note that despite certain sips giving me cause for concern I did enjoy the overall drinking experience.

This imperial pumpkin ale was medium bodied, and despite some alcohol being detected in the taste was overall pretty drinkable. For me the spices never became overwhelming, but I could see others thinking the all spice and cinnamon were too strong because the spiciness built up and lingered at the back of my palate as I sipped more. Next, due to the fact that there’s a fair amount of imperial pumpkin ales on the market nowadays I compared Good Gourd to other imperial pumpkin ales that I’ve tried. In my opinion it fit in with the good ones that I’d try again if the opportunity presented itself (remember I don’t seek them out as often as I used to). Also, the candle sensation and slight earthiness in the finish of some sips did prevent it from being a favorite or go to imperial pumpkin ale….”still a well executed beer, just a little rough around the edges.” Rating: 7/10

20121202_220845Big Sound Scotch Ale

The third and final beer of this trio of full flavored / “big” beers was one I had tried and enjoyed in the past. As a scotch ale / wee heavy clocking in at 9% abv and stylistically featuring a robust malt character; Big Sound was a perfect December night cap beer. It poured an attractive really deep dark red to brown color with a thin layer of off white head that quickly dissipated to a ring around the edges of the beer, and left alcohol legs and some lacing on my glass.

Aromas of toffee, dark fruit, caramel, cherries, and a touch of semisweet chocolate greeted my nose with each whiff, which to me indicated that I was in for a full flavored and palate pleasing beer. Big Sound’s flavor profile was  to me an intensified version of the aroma and a great blend of flavors commonly found in scotch ales. Upfront my palate was met with dark fruits, dark cherries, toffee, and caramel. At mid palate I was able to discern which fruits I was tasting; the cherry notes had a slight tartness to them and there was nice fig and date sweetness as well. Once the beer warmed up the toffee notes took on a slight nuttiness, the fruits became brighter tasting (more apparent), and hints of chocolate weaved their way through the rest of the flavor profile. In fact the chocolate notes helped me appreciate the beer’s complexity.

Despite being a malt forward beer Big Sound was not too sweet, had a semi dry finish, and its alcohol content was hidden quite well. Secondly, it was on the higher end of medium bodied and had the right amount of carbonation to aid the drinkability of this full flavored beer. Lastly, I should note that while the winter is popularly seen by American craft beer drinkers as “stout season”; scotch ales are also great to fight the colder weather (Fall/Winter) chill. To me Big Sound is not only spot on for its style, but its complex and robust flavor profile are exactly what I like in a scotch ale / wee heavy. Rating: 8.5/10

Cheers to Joey and Jen Redner, Wayne Wambles, and the entire Cigar City Brewing Co. team!! I look forward to reviewing more of your great beers in the future.

Posted in Beer Reviews | 1 Comment

TBP Podcast: Founders Brewing Co.’s Mike Stevens

IMG_1402

(Mike, the NY area Founders Team, and I)

On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 I went to Blind Tiger Ale House for its annual VSK (Very Special Keg) event featuring rare craft beers that the manager and owner have been saving over the past year. Beyond the excitement to try some rare beers, there was another reason why I chose to attend this special event. Mike Stevens, co-founder, CEO, and president of Founders Brewing Company (Grand Rapids, Michigan) was in attendance and excited to celebrate his brewery’s 15 anniversary with New York City fans of his beers. Having been informed by the brewery that he’d be there I brought my audio recorder with me to interview him. Overall, I was quite impressed with Mike’s excitement for spreading the messages of craft beer and the sense of humility he displayed when talking about his brewery’s beers.

The following topics were covered during the interview (podcast):

  • Congratulations on 15 years of craft brewing
  • What does 15 years mean to you as a CEO? How craft beer has changed over time?
  • Founders beers in the New York City market
  • Growth of demand and respect for Founders beers
  • Passion behind the culture / atmosphere at the brewery
  • History of the Founders barrel program (maple bourbon and regular bourbon barrels)
  • Bolt Cutter Barleywine (15th Anniversary Ale), Backstage Series
  • Unique flavor profile contributed by the maple bourbon barrels
  • Looking to the future of Founders Brewing Company
  • What Founders Brewing Co. represents within the continuously growing craft beer industry / community.
  • Mike’s admiration of his team at Founders Brewing Co.
  • Parting words and messages “Holding onto the passion behind craft brewing”

Cheers to Mike, Founders Brewing Company, and Blind Tiger Ale House!

Posted in Brewmaster Interviews, Craft Beer Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Founders Bolt Cutter Barleywine

BREWERY’S DESCRIPTION: Bolt Cutter is a cellarable barley wine with an ABV of 15%. Dry-hopped with a mountain of Cascade hops, it’s balanced by a malty sweetness and spicy complexity, resulting from barrel aging some of it in bourbon barrels, some in maple syrup-bourbon barrels and some not at all (standard fermentation only). We’ve allowed the beer to mature in bottles and kegs since July so that it would be perfect for its release next month. Bolt Cutter pours a deep copper color and is best sampled at different temperatures to allow the flavors to unfold.

Following in the footsteps of previous Backstage Series beers Bolt Cutter barleywine (15th Anniversary Ale) was a beer that for me presented the following challenge. I had to try my hardest to put aside what I expected the beer to taste like based on the barrel character of previous beers in this serious (e.g. Canadian Breakfast Stout and Curmudgeon’s Better Half). Luckily there were two important brewing techniques used to ensure that Bolt Cutter would stand out; dry hopping and the blending of beer that was aged in bourbon barrels, maple syrup-bourbon barrels and some not at all (standard fermentation only). So with an eagerness to taste characteristics of previous beers and a thirst for innovation I opened the 750ml bottle and got to “work”.

Upon pouring the beer into my Founders snifter glass I began to admire its dark copper color (some amber hues), great clarity, and 2 finger off white head. While there wasn’t much carbonation streaming up the middle of the beer, there was a fair amount of medium sized bubbles around the edges and bottom of the glass. In addition, as I drank on the head left a fair amount of lacing on my glass.

It was in the aroma that the challenge mentioned above began. After splitting the bottles with my two brothers and taking the above picture, I went in for my first whiff of this special beer. My first reaction was…”maybe I should have kept in the fridge to preserve hop character?” Meaning, I had to really dig for the hints of tropical fruits (citrus) from the Cascade hops and was met with a malt character that at first reminded me of a double IPA whose hop character had started to fade. That malt character included caramel, toffee, graham cracker, and some spiciness that at times is present in bourbon. Looking back on previous Backstage series beers that were aged in maple syrup bourbon barrels (e.g. CBS), I was surprised not to pick up much vanilla, coconut, or apparent oak in the aroma. Though I should note that as I sipped the beer and pondered the thought that went into this beer I was able to appreciate and enjoy the aroma and its complexities a bit more.

As with most higher ABV beers the initial taste (flavor profile) of this beer was quite similar to aroma. The malts shined with the bready / graham cracker notes preventing the caramel and toffee flavors from becoming too sweet. At times I picked up some oak and spiciness at mid palate before being met with some sweet citrus and dark fruit notes in the finish. As in the aroma the lack of the hops and barrel character as prominent flavors worried me a bit and at times a tone of apprehension for what the beer would taste like as it warmed up set in. However, as the beer warmed up I put aside my preconceived expectations and enjoyed the complex caramel and toffee malt character that blended with a spicy-somewhat woody oak flavor and some citrus and dark fruit. This led me to conclude that the blending of the two types of barrels with a portion that was not barrel aged allowed the base barleywine to shine and be accented by the sweetness and spiciness from the bourbon barrels rather than vanilla etc (typical of bourbon barrel aged beers). At 15% ABV Bolt Cutter had a smooth medium body which hid the alcohol quite well and made it only noticeable in the form of some heat felt in my chest after each sip.

Rating this beer was a bit difficult, but in the end I chose to focus on the following three factors. Because this beer represents the 15 year history of Founders Brewing Company it was successful in blending new (barrel aging) and old (authentic to style) flavors. Next, it had a unique malt complexity the and its ABV was hidden quite well. Lastly, due to the hop character tasting a bit faded I most likely did not taste the full potential of this beer. Hence, I chose give Bolt Cutter an 8/10 (at times thought of giving it a 7.5). My recommendation is to buy two bottles, one to drink fresh and the other to age. I am curious to see how the malt character of this beer will develop over time.

Cheers and Happy Anniversary to Founders Brewing Company!!!

Posted in Beer Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Ken Schmidt / Iron First / Stone Mint chocolate Imperial Stout

BREWERY’S DESCRIPTION

Over the past few years Stone Brewing Company (Escondid0, CA) has become known for bringing together some of the most talented craft brewers to brew collaboration beers. Included in the list of their boundary pushing brews is an annual production batch of Stone’s annual homebrew competition’s winning beer. The 2012 winner was Ken Schmidt, who entered his mint chocolate imperial stout and again wowed the judges enough to choose it as the winning beer. You may remember him from his 2009 winning beer Ken Schmidt / Maui/ Stone Kona Coffee, Macadamia, Coconut Porter. Hence, having enjoyed his first winning beer I was excited to see what his second beer would bring to the table.

This 9.6% imperial stout poured dark black in color with a khaki to light brown head that left a considerable amount of lacing on my glass. Initially the aroma reminded me of Stone’s Imperial Russian Stout with big notes of dark chocolate, milk chocolate, and caramel and bready malts. However, as the beer warmed up the mint became more apparent and reminded me of chocolate covered after dinner mints and Thin Mints.

One the palate I was met with dark and milk chocolate that was followed quite nicely by a kiss of peppermint and rounded out by hints of the various speciality malts used. At times the added malt flavor (beyond the chocolate and caramel) reminded me of  graham crackers and pie crust. I should note that before buying this beer I read some reviews that said the mint flavor would be subtle, but I picked it up right away. Once the beer warmed up its flavor profile was all about the flavors blending together because the dark chocolate wasn’t as prominent and became part of the beers overall complexity.

Moving onto mouthfeel and drinkability; the beer was medium to full bodied and a felt a tingle of carbonation in the finish. For 9.6% this Mint Chocolate Imperial Stout was quite drinkable and I enjoyed sipping it while watching TV.

As is the case with most collaboration beers; the following question must be answered once one has finished drinking the beer. Was it a successful collaboration? Or better put…Were the brewers successful in executing their goal for the finished product? In most cases this means a good tasting unique beer. In my opinion this was indeed a successful collaboration because the mint and chocolate components blended quite well and neither of them dominated the beers flavor profile to the point that I questioned how much I was enjoying the drinking experience. Though in my notes that I wrote while drinking this beer I wrote that I am “not sure I’d buy a bottle to age” and that “I think the added ingredients are meant to be enjoyed fresh” and I therefore “may buy more to enjoy over the winter / colder months.”

Rating: 8/10

Posted in Beer Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment